Common table expression简称CTE,由SQL:1999标准引入, 目前支持CTE的数据库有Teradata, DB2, Firebird, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle (with recursion since 11g release 2), PostgreSQL (since 8.4), MariaDB (since 10.2), SQLite (since 3.8.3), HyperSQL and H2 (experimental), MySQL8.0.
CTE的语法如下:
WITH [RECURSIVE] with_query [, ...] SELECT... with_query: query_name [ (column_name [,...]) ] AS (SELECT ...)以下图示来自MariaDB
Non-recursive CTEs
Recursive CTEs
例如以下两个语句表达的是同一语义,使用CTE比未使用CTE的嵌套查询更简洁明了。
1) 使用嵌套子查询
SELECT MAX(txt), MIN(txt) FROM ( SELECT concat(cte2.txt, cte3.txt) as txt FROM ( SELECT CONCAT(cte1.txt,'is a ') as txt FROM ( SELECT 'This ' as txt ) as cte1 ) as cte2, ( SELECT 'nice query' as txt UNION SELECT 'query that rocks' UNION SELECT 'query' ) as cte3 ) as cte4;2) 使用CTE
WITH cte1(txt) AS (SELECT "This "), cte2(txt) AS (SELECT CONCAT(cte1.txt,"is a ") FROM cte1), cte3(txt) AS (SELECT "nice query" UNION SELECT "query that rocks" UNION SELECT "query"), cte4(txt) AS (SELECT concat(cte2.txt, cte3.txt) FROM cte2, cte3) SELECT MAX(txt), MIN(txt) FROM cte4; CTE 可以进行树形查询 初始化这颗树 create table t1(id int, value char(10), parent_id int); insert into t1 values(1, 'A', NULL); insert into t1 values(2, 'B', 1); insert into t1 values(3, 'C', 1); insert into t1 values(4, 'D', 1); insert into t1 values(5, 'E', 2); insert into t1 values(6, 'F', 2); insert into t1 values(7, 'G', 4); insert into t1 values(8, 'H', 6);1) 层序遍历
with recursive cte as ( select id, value, 0 as level from t1 where parent_id is null union all select t1.id, t1.value, cte.level+1 from cte join t1 on t1.parent_id=cte.id) select * from cte; +------+-------+-------+ | id | value | level | +------+-------+-------+ | 1 | A | 0 | | 2 | B | 1 | | 3 | C | 1 | | 4 | D | 1 | | 5 | E | 2 | | 6 | F | 2 | | 7 | G | 2 | | 8 | H | 3 | +------+-------+-------+2) 深度优先遍历
with recursive cte as ( select id, value, 0 as level, CAST(id AS CHAR(200)) AS path from t1 where parent_id is null union all select t1.id, t1.value, cte.level+1, CONCAT(cte.path, ",", t1.id) from cte join t1 on t1.parent_id=cte.id) select * from cte order by path; +------+-------+-------+---------+ | id | value | level | path | +------+-------+-------+---------+ | 1 | A | 0 | 1 | | 2 | B | 1 | 1,2 | | 5 | E | 2 | 1,2,5 | | 6 | F | 2 | 1,2,6 | | 8 | H | 3 | 1,2,6,8 | | 3 | C | 1 | 1,3 | | 4 | D | 1 | 1,4 | | 7 | G | 2 | 1,4,7 | +------+-------+-------+---------+Oracle从9.2才开始支持CTE, 但只支持non-recursive with, 直到Oracle 11.2才完全支持CTE。但oracle 之前就支持connect by 的树形查询,recursive with 语句可以与connect by语句相互转化。 一些相互转化案例可以参考这里.
Oracle recursive with 语句不需要指定recursive关键字,可以自动识别是否recursive.
Oracle 还支持CTE相关的hint,
WITH dept_count AS ( SELECT /*+ MATERIALIZE */ deptno, COUNT(*) AS dept_count FROM emp GROUP BY deptno) SELECT ... WITH dept_count AS ( SELECT /*+ INLINE */ deptno, COUNT(*) AS dept_count FROM emp GROUP BY deptno) SELECT ...“MATERIALIZE”告诉优化器产生一个全局的临时表保存结果,多次引用CTE时直接访问临时表即可。而”INLINE”则表示每次需要解析查询CTE。
PostgreSQL从8.4开始支持CTE,PostgreSQL还扩展了CTE的功能, CTE的query中支持DML语句,例如
create table t1 (c1 int, c2 char(10)); insert into t1 values(1,'a'),(2,'b'); select * from t1; c1 | c2 ----+---- 1 | a 2 | b WITH cte AS ( UPDATE t1 SET c1= c1 * 2 where c1=1 RETURNING * ) SELECT * FROM cte; //返回更新的值 c1 | c2 ----+------------ 2 | a truncate table t1; insert into t1 values(1,'a'),(2,'b'); WITH cte AS ( UPDATE t1 SET c1= c1 * 2 where c1=1 RETURNING * ) SELECT * FROM t1;//返回原值 c1 | c2 ----+------------ 1 | a 2 | b truncate table t1; insert into t1 values(1,'a'),(2,'b'); WITH cte AS ( DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c1=1 RETURNING * ) SELECT * FROM cte;//返回删除的行 c1 | c2 ----+------------ 1 | a truncate table t1; insert into t1 values(1,'a'),(2,'b'); WITH cte AS ( DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c1=1 RETURNING * ) SELECT * FROM t1;//返回原值 c1 | c2 ----+------------ 1 | a 2 | b (2 rows)MariaDB从10.2开始支持CTE。10.2.1 支持non-recursive CTE, 10.2.2开始支持recursive CTE。 目前的GA的版本是10.1.
MySQL从8.0开始支持完整的CTE。MySQL8.0还在development 阶段,RC都没有,GA还需时日。
AliSQL基于mariadb10.2, port了no-recursive CTE的实现,此功能近期会上线。
以下从源码主要相关函数简要介绍其实现,
//解析识别with table引用 find_table_def_in_with_clauses
//检查依赖关系,比如不能重复定义with table名字 With_clause::check_dependencies
// 为每个引用clone一份定义 With_element::clone_parsed_spec
//替换with table指定的列名 With_element::rename_columns_of_derived_unit
此实现对于多次引用CTE,CTE会解析多次,因此此版本CTE有简化SQL的作用,但效率上没有效提高。
select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z'; +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 65536 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.25 sec) //从执行时间来看是进行了3次全表扫描 with t as (select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z') select * from t union select * from t union select * from t; +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 65536 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.59 sec) select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z'; +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 65536 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.57 sec) explain with t as (select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z') -> select * from t union select * from t union select * from t; +------+-----------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +------+-----------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | 1 | PRIMARY | <derived2> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | | | 2 | SUBQUERY | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | 3 | RECURSIVE UNION | <derived5> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | | | 5 | SUBQUERY | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | 4 | RECURSIVE UNION | <derived6> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | | | 6 | SUBQUERY | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | NULL | UNION RESULT | <union1,3,4> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | | +------+-----------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ 7 rows in set (0.00 sec) explain select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z'; +------+--------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +------+--------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | 1 | PRIMARY | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | 2 | UNION | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | 3 | UNION | t1 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 65536 | Using where | | NULL | UNION RESULT | <union1,2,3> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | | +------+--------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)以下是MySQL8.0 只扫描一次的执行计划
mysql> explain select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z' union select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z'; +----+--------------+--------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------+ | id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra | +----+--------------+--------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------+ | 1 | PRIMARY | t1 | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 62836 | 90.00 | Using where | | 2 | UNION | t1 | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 62836 | 90.00 | Using where | | 3 | UNION | t1 | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 62836 | 90.00 | Using where | | NULL | UNION RESULT | <union1,2,3> | NULL | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Using temporary | +----+--------------+--------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+----------+-----------------+ 4 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)以下是PostgreSQL9.4 只扫描一次的执行计划
postgres=# explain with t as (select count(*) from t1 where c2 !='z') postgres-# select * from t union select * from t union select * from t; HashAggregate (cost=391366.28..391366.31 rows=3 width=8) Group Key: t.count CTE t -> Aggregate (cost=391366.17..391366.18 rows=1 width=0) -> Seq Scan on t1 (cost=0.00..384392.81 rows=2789345 width=0) Filter: ((c2)::text <> 'z'::text) -> Append (cost=0.00..0.09 rows=3 width=8) -> CTE Scan on t (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8) -> CTE Scan on t t_1 (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8) -> CTE Scan on t t_2 (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8)AliSQL还有待改进。
